Religion what is it and what is it about? Saturday, Jun 30 2007 

Concept:
Religion

A non-Academic
Review

6/23/07

re•li•gion \ri-“li-j€n\ noun [ME religioun, fr. L religion-, religio supernatural constraint, sanction, religious practice, perh. fr. religare to restrain, tie back — more at rely] (13c)
1 a: the state of a religious
b (1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural
(2) : commitment or devotion to religious faith or observance
2 : a personal set or institutionalized system of religious attitudes, beliefs, and practices
3 archaic : scrupulous conformity : conscientiousness
4 : a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith
re•li•gion•less adjective

© 1996 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated

The Encyclopedia of Religion defines religion this way:
In summary, it may be said that almost every known culture involves the religious in the above sense of a depth dimension in cultural experiences at all levels — a push, whether ill-defined or conscious, toward some sort of ultimate and transcendence that will provide norms and power for the rest of life. When more or less distinct patterns of behaviour are built around this depth dimension in a culture, this structure constitutes religion in its historically recognizable form. Religion is the organization of life around the depth dimensions of experience — varied in form, completeness, and clarity in accordance with the envisioning culture.”

PREFACE

Weather it be Christianity, Judaism, Islam or any other of the world’s religions, let us start at the beginning and look at religion in it’s formative stages.
In accordance with the thought processes of the times in which any particular religion came into being, it appears that it was the conceptualization of an individual whom had an altering experience and was had insights that others were not privy to. This individual then rose through the hierarchy of that group because he could supply answers or had a close following of selected individuals that never questioned his word on anything.
In the cause of Christianity, God used men like Adam, Abraham, Noah, Moses, Joshua and others down through the years to bring His word to the world, at that time the world was primarily located in the area that we now call Iraq, Iran, Turkey, and Israel. Here is where the first recorded incidents took place between the notable belief systems; they were of course the Greeks, the Romans, the Israelites, and the other varied belief structures of the world.
The concept of religion came about to fill a need that was experienced by man due to not being able to, in his limited capacity, explain his purpose. Even at this juncture, man had to have relevance within his situation, which has not changed even today.
But, how could he explain things that are beyond the scope of his abilities?
For example; without using any reference toward a “Higher Being or Divine Intervention”
1) Explain how we have water, true we have the basic parts of water and can with science have the elements in three varied states; liquid, solid, and gas. That is not questioned, but how are these elements combined and held together to make water?
2) Explain how everything on the face of the Earth works together cohesively without the intervention of man, yet when man (the highest form of life on the planet) interferes with Nature, it always runs amok, until man backs away and leaves it alone.
Before man became the cultured, educated, controlling entity he is today, he had the mind of a child and looked on things with wonder and awe. The explanations of that day were simple and to the point. I can imagine the caveman looking at a sprout when winter turned to spring and saying to himself, this was not here yesterday, so what changed? Then looking at the sun and feeling the warmth, again saying to himself “This bright thing is the giver of life” and falling in front of it in awe of this new revelation, and returning to his tribe reiterating his find and saying “I have discovered something”
Then again stating what he believed as truth “The Bright Thing is the giver of life, it feeds us, it warms us, when we are good it returns to us, when we do wrong, it leaves us and the ground gets cold and there is no food. We must therefore recognize the Bright Thing as more than us.”
Ergo a belief system is born, and through this discoverer, comes the dictates of how to edify this new “Higher Being/Higher entity” Thereby religion is born.
Though this is a very highly stylized interpretation of the beginnings of religion, there could easily be a basis of fact in it. One of my assertions is, religion is the creation of man to edify through action and rules that which he cannot explain.
The concept of a “Higher Being” becomes reasonable when after careful consideration, man, the explorer finally reaches the place where he has seen the true valuation of self in aspects differing from his own interpretive powers, one’s view of self is often overly inflated, and does not always match the reality within which we interact with others.
Each individual faith/belief system appears to hinge on the tenant that it and only it is the true faith sought by God, Allah, Buddha or whomever or whatever resides in the position of austerity given by the group of devotees. The pattern of devotion appears always to be the same, Emotionalism, Acceptance, Fervor, Commitment, and Comfort.
The emotionalism is usually a product of disillusionment with the normal experience that human beings encounter in everyday life, and therefore asking the age old question, “Is this all there is?” which in turn prompts the response of “I do not accept that, there has got to be something MORE!
Within the context of this statement I hope to map the need for a belief system in the life of a Human Being, this will include the Agnostic, and Atheist also.

Please let me know what your views are on this subject.

Life on the boarder Thursday, Jun 7 2007 

Today I was reading the Washington Post and I happened across the article having to do with the Immigration Reform bill in Congress. On one hand I was very happy to here it never made it out of filibuster, but on the other hand I was kind of frustrated that it ended this way. The finger pointing and the comments such as “The bill did not fail, Bush failed.” Seems to me that President Bush did not author the bill, that was the Democrats or did the rotund one(Ted Kennedy) switch his statements again. The bill that was presented for a vote and the bill that died today were about as closely related as the Pope and the Atheists.
By the time of debate, the bill had been altered by so many amendments that the amendments took over the life of the bill. I guess that is what is called compromise for the cause, right?
I am totally surprised by the rhetoric in Washington as to the authorship of this bill and again the finger pointing. But, the thing that really surprises me as well as that august body in wah-wah Washington was the response of the people at large, the galvanization of those in favor of the bill and those opposed to the bill was to say the least, extremely impressive, this galvanization was across the board, from John Q. Public, to civic activist groups, to Religious community activists groups, to Labor Organizations. These voices were heard in the hallowed halls of the edifices in Washington and all of a sudden, ears started to turn away from their own brain numbing vocal tones to those of “We the People”. Now, this is the America I know and love, this is the America I gladly gave 24 years of my life for, this is the America I stood for and will continue to stand for. To this I say “God bless us all, and please stay active. And please God don’t let us go back to “Taking it for granted” or “let the other guy do it.”

The Human Element; does it always have to be like this? Sunday, Jun 3 2007 

In the first Element post, I shared some pretty general ideas, it might have seemed like I was just rambling along and taking potshots at whatever came to mind.

But there was a purpose, it seems that some people who are impressed with their station in life get the idea that if they make enough noise, people around them will differ to their way of thinking. And for some reason those same people seem to get away with it.

On the world stage for example, there are a group of people of Arab decent that seem to want nothing more than the disruption of life on every front ;irregardless of even what they pledge themselves to. To be specific, I speak of the group known as Hamas who in my opinion are nothing more than street thugs in the guise of “Holy War”, there is absolutely nothing I can see about them that is “Holy”, they agree to a truce, then within hours of the truce being ratified, after the Jews step back from the firing line and start the fighting again for no apparent reason other than to just kill. These are Palestinians, what do you expect from a people who’s “Nation” did not exist prior to 1946. Please do not misconstrue what I have said, I do not hold the complete nation of Islam responsible for the action of a very few who claim religious zeal as a cover for murder and mayhem. How can one believe that religion could be the basis for genocide, though throughout the years of man’s reign on the earth, that is exactly what happens. Religion is a human based philosophy to give some semblance of respectability to what usually turns out to be abhorrent behavior when carried to an extreme. There is nowhere in any “Book of Faith” that I have ever seen where murder is glorified. This has only come about through the mechanisms of man when he adds to these books. These people who are also called “Terrorists” are nothing more than murderers and liars and should be treated as such. There was a time in my life when I would have thought nothing of going where they are and heaping terror on them with no regrets, no quarter asked, none given. But, it is not the individual that holds the rifle or drives the bomb on wheels that deserves all the blame, the ones responsible are the ones who put the rifle in the hands of the terrorist and the ones who supply the ingredients for the bombs that go into the cars. These are the ones who deserve no mercy, these are the ones I hold responsible. But the worst part of the whole thing, is that these people who send out the suicide bombers and the hooded murderers are a few years later voted Man of the Year, case in point Yasser Arafat, need I say more or has history been rewritten to please a few?

In my next post, we will look a little more closely at other incidents of a similar nature.

Until then

D-Man